Subscribe to the blogs

Triple A Learning IB Blogs

September 17, 2010

TOK and literature 3: perspectives

I put aside the book I´m currently reading to return to thoughts on literature and TOK. I´m enjoying the book immensely, largely because it takes me to a part of the world that I don´t know and absorbs me into lives utterly unlike my own, with their unfamiliar worldviews, values, and concerns. It´s What the Body Remembers by Shauna Singh Baldwin, and as I close it I return from the Punjab in my mind to the chair where I sit. I feel as if I know more from having entered imaginatively a work that extends my own understanding of human beings experiencing their own lives in the world. In this way, literature offers splendidly a quality that we value in TOK – perspectives – even though in the two courses we end up considering perspectives rather differently.

Literature, as we note in both literature class and TOK, uses a method of engagement through the particular and the subjective. In most literature, we respond to particular characters with names, places, and life circumstances. In literature that does not use characters and narrative, such as much poetry, we are still engaged through the specific details and the individual vision of the speaker or author. In literature, the particular roots the general; the writer´s view of life, however dispassionately or realistically observed and documented, is carried by the choices of character, setting, themes, and language within an individual work. These choices are subjective (though ¨naturalists¨attempt a ¨scientific objectivity¨), reflecting the writer´s own experiences and views, just as the experience of reading is subjective as the reader enters the imaginative world created and responds in a personal way. In the writing and reading of literature, personal perspectives are very much in play.

Read more…

September 15, 2010

TOK and literature 2: believing and knowing as subject matter

Since long before the IB was founded and TOK created as a subject, literature has been dealing with ideas that are intimately connected with many topics we raise in TOK. As a teacher of literature myself, I came to TOK with a sense of familiarity, first noticing the similarities then, as TOK came into focus for me, increasingly seeing the differences. I invite any teacher of both literature and TOK to add to the few thoughts that I offer here.

As you too must have noticed, writers return frequently to treat believing and knowing in innumerable ways, involving structure, characters, and themes.

Read more…

TOK and literature 1: preamble

Filed under: TOK meets global citizenship — Tags: , , — Eileen Dombrowski @ 5:09 pm


It can be startling to come across reminders of what and how you once thought. Coming across old diaries or old school essays can give a flash of recognition, but at the same time an odd sense of distance. Did I really think then in such a limited way? Could I really write whole pages of French then with vocabulary whose meaning I now can infer only from context? Why did I…? Why didn´t I…? Sorting through old TOK papers last month brought to the surface not just the material on logical fallacies I posted in August – which, as I said, I approach quite differently now – but also an article I wrote in 1991 on TOK and literature in the TOK newsletter Forum. Having continued to read, live, and teach both English literature and TOK for a couple of decades since then, I paged through it with immense curiosity. How has my thinking changed? And so….

….and so, I push aside the tempting knowledge issues concerning memory and the construction of self-knowledge (with hugely selected retrospection) to return to the ideas I had then about TOK and literature. I plan to plunder ideas from my younger self and reshape them as I think about them now. I´ll share them here in upcoming postings in the hopes that others will add their comments to build up some collective thinking. If you happen to teach both literature and TOK, I am sure that you´ll have plenty to contribute.

Read more…