Today we look at the last IA criteria – Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv), aspect 3.
Recall that for CEv, apsect 2, the exerimental method is critically evaluated. For aspect 3, realistic improvements must be stated.
Today we look at the last IA criteria – Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv), aspect 3.
Recall that for CEv, apsect 2, the exerimental method is critically evaluated. For aspect 3, realistic improvements must be stated.
Today we will consider Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv), aspect 2.
This aspect deals with the students thoroughly investigating the experimental method. What didn’t work well and why? What happened to make the quality of the results not as good as what they should have been? The reasons should relate to the direction of the calculated value with respect to the data book value.
The theme for the next couple of days will be Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv).
Aspect one is split into three parts and is, in my opinion, the hardest of all of the aspect to achieve a ‘c’ in.
Todays positng will cover an overview of IA:
IA counts towards 25% of the final Chemistry grade.
Over the next few days / weeks, we will focus on the various skill areas and aspects for the three internal assessment (IA) criteria, namely:
This a nice, simple IA lab that is worth trying out. In a nutshell,
the basic procedure is as follows: