Today we look at the last IA criteria – Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv), aspect 3.
Recall that for CEv, apsect 2, the exerimental method is critically evaluated. For aspect 3, realistic improvements must be stated.
Today we look at the last IA criteria – Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv), aspect 3.
Recall that for CEv, apsect 2, the exerimental method is critically evaluated. For aspect 3, realistic improvements must be stated.
The theme for the next couple of days will be Conclusion and Evaluation (CEv).
Aspect one is split into three parts and is, in my opinion, the hardest of all of the aspect to achieve a ‘c’ in.
DCP, aspect 3:
Students seem to find this difficult to achieve a ‘c’. The aspect is looking for students to correctly present their final answer (to the correct number of significant figures) and to display an uncertainty / error value (to the correct number of significant figures).
Today, we will move away from Design and consider ‘Data Processing and Presentation’ (DCP) aspect 1.
DCP is all about collecting raw data, displaying it and processing it.
Today we will focus on Design, Aspect 3.
In order to achieve a ‘c in this aspect, the student must write a detailed method. The emphasis is on the word detailed. The student should essentially be able to give another IB Chemist the method and they would be able to carry it out.
Sorry for the delay – I have been on my half term holiday
So, my last posting covered Design, Aspect 1 – today, it is onto Design, Aspect 2.
Today we will look at Design aspect 1.
This criteria is really split into two parts – the research question and the variables.
Todays positng will cover an overview of IA:
IA counts towards 25% of the final Chemistry grade.
Over the next few days / weeks, we will focus on the various skill areas and aspects for the three internal assessment (IA) criteria, namely: